Another
advantage is an increase of generation efficiency. Because the loss generated
in the process of fuel can be reduced, the solid oxide type has 5% higher
generation efficiency than solid high molecule type (41% vs. 36%). And
technological progress may be able to improve the generation efficiency
further. At the same time, the solid oxide type accepts a smaller hot-water
tank because the storage temperature can be set higher. The system of the solid
oxide type could be two thirds of the system of the high molecule type. This
makes it possible to reduce the installation cost and install the system in the
place where it cannot be installed at present. Actually, the industry strongly
expects the solid oxide type to be widespread after it is commercialized.
Thursday, December 1, 2011
No. 24: On new type fuel cells (2/2) (December 2, 2011)
The
solid oxide type has several advantages over the solid high molecule type. One
of them is that the treatment process of fuel can be simplified. The latter
accepts only highly pure hydrogen as fuel. Ene Farm needs very sophisticated
treatment to collect highly pure hydrogen from city gas and liquefied petroleum
gas (LPG), resulting in energy loss and a high-cost structure of the system. In
the case of the solid oxide type, city gas and LPG can be introduced directly
into the module of a fuel cell and modified inside the system. Accordingly, the
system can be simplified.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment